@ the Movies/ Catfish
![Image](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTCK6npWtlM3eoPT6XHONPr4BN9KvxnPcC3bTrV0SgCdM5Zhrczcr-zuXK0L6YLr_8rYZfY9krvhRJZsA2Oc8ra5T-jKoQtdMK_s0W8Ejrm2hKWF_WWL6w7RObLe37bTQnSNWs_bZwl9jH/s400/Catfish.jpg)
Slow-moving documentary has the potential to take the road less travelled, but ends up in the ditch instead BY EMIL TIEDEMANN W E'VE all been told never to judge a book by its cover, right? But a movie by its trailer? You'd think that one could develop an accurate opinion based almost entirely on those two-minute teaser clips that are essentially the synopsis of its parent film. Not always. Case in point, Henry Joost & Ariel Schulman 's "documentary" Catfish that presents itself as a suspense thriller that is "not inspired by true events...just true." But its own authenticity as an actual docu-film isn't the issue at hand (though lets put a tac in that). I can't sit here and condone distorted depictions, not when I'm spending something like twenty bucks every time I go to the theatre. And especially not when my anticipation gets the best of me. You see, it was this film's trailer--and a few choice words by "respectable" cr